Architecture
Is the system coherent, maintainable, and understandable by a future team?
Technical Due Diligence
For investors, acquirers, and operators before signing: you get an independent product and engineering review of risk, cost, team capability, and integration reality.
Decision output
The review turns technical uncertainty into deal-relevant evidence so your partners, operators, or investment committee can decide whether to proceed, renegotiate, or plan remediation ownership.
Review focus
Is the system coherent, maintainable, and understandable by a future team?
Are there obvious data, auth, privacy, dependency, or operational risks?
Can the current team execute the plan after the deal?
What breaks, slows down, or gets expensive as usage grows?
Output
Material technical risks with severity, likelihood, and mitigation path.
What it will likely cost to fix, stabilize, or integrate the system.
Findings from code, infrastructure, documentation, product flows, and interviews.
A concise report for partners, operators, or investment committee.
Process
Deal context, concerns, timeline, and access plan.
Code, infrastructure, product, process, and team interviews.
Risks, dependencies, constraints, and remediation paths.
Report and findings call.
Good fit
Not a fit
Start with deal context, timeline, and access under NDA.
Schedule diligence introOperator, not investor?